Neither of them is quite correct.
The first core story came about due to folks discussing how UFO’s must be something that the US government knows about, and before long this presumption of facts has turned into a ‘fish story’ about crashed craft and EBE’s (bashful acronym for organic ‘aliens’). This first core story almost certainly came about at a Denny’s in the 70’s where folks with security clearances were wondering why their clearances and contacts were not currently enough to know ‘the truth’, but that there were ‘hints’ that tantalized them.
This same sort of thing had really been happening since the late 1940’s, with multiple groups of well-connected people.
Now of course people had been talking this way since Kenneth Arnold was misquoted about something he saw near Mount Rainier, Washington in 1947. The ‘objects were assumed to be metallic as they glinted in the sun and were flying faster than 1200 miles per hour. Given improvements in technology late in WWII, it’s not an unusual assumption to be made. However later in life Kenneth Arnold recanted, saying they were of a different shape and were alive,
and some sort of animal. But nobody wanted to hear that, and they still don’t. They want rocket ships like in the movies!
Now, it makes me almost nauseous to bring up the topic of Roswell, but in any case, whatever happened there (it was NOT a nuts-and-bolts UFO in all likelihood). The story about Roswell had slipped away to nothing within a couple weeks, until Bill Moore and Charles Berlitz in their book, “The Roswell Incident” came up with a imaginative theory about the balloon crash. (whatever it was, there’s little doubt it was a balloon crash, there never were any sizeable chunks of anything found, but just balsa, rubber, duckie shelf paper, etc., at least that’s a pretty credible report).
Really, it doesn’t make any difference what Roswell was or wasn’t. None of the MANY stories about crashed saucers make the slightest difference, except psychologically.
According to what I and others know, all the ‘crash talk’ is the COVER STORY, not the thing that needs disclosure. All that talk is what KEEPS ‘ACTUAL DISCLOSURE’ at bay.
People are willing to believe in nuts-and-bolts UFOS, just like Hollywood had trained them to believe. It’s very exciting and an easy sell.
Now, when ‘insiders’ say they know a guy, who knows a guy, who saw a nuts-and-bolts UFO, then everyone howls with glee, just like they have been trained to believe for all these decades.
Now there’s the OTHER ‘core story’ which has elements of truth to it. That story is that the ‘Phenomenon’ (whatever that is) is like a mind virus that leaps from person to person, like a disease, and get this— that it sometimes produces physical effects. There are elements of truth
to this ‘other core story’. If you research poltergeists, for example (see: “The Smoking Gun of UFO Disclosure“), you rapidly realize that “Poltergeist effects” and “UFOs” are joined at the hip. Now this isn’t new to anybody, ever since Jacques Vallee started writing his insightful books, this sort of thing has been theorized.
The problem with the ‘real-ish’ core story, is that it absolutely TERRIFIES religious conservatives within the government, as they think it means ‘demons’ are behind things. It terrifies others who experience ‘the Hitchhiker effect, where poltergeist phenomenon follow them home and terrorize their families.
No government wants to admit that the country is being plagued by ‘ghosts’, and that not only do they know about it, they take it seriously, but can do nothing whatsoever about it, so the core story number one is ‘trumpeted far and wide’, previously the story was made more powerful by denying it (everybody loves conspiracy theories) and now by admitting it’, but, but you will note that all ‘evidence’, every single time, turns out to be a documented, intentional fake, a misidentification, or blurry photos shot by Naval aviators. Now as we know, the “Tic Tac” story really opened things up for discussion, and again, truly suspect that those incidents were ‘nothing of importance’, except in a very unusual way, it has changed everything.
It is, is what I call ‘the Stay-Puft Marshallow Man effect’ from the movie ‘Ghostbusters’. It’s also a well-known and documented effect much discussed in shamanistic and other circles, including by the world-famous scholar on the topic, Mircea Eliade. It’s also known as ‘fake it until
you make it’.
I also call this the ‘Unintended summoning effect’ and in fact I wrote this paper up and sent it to the ‘legacy insiders’ back in the day, as I knew two of them. I did get a ‘nod’ that the paper was interesting, but that’s as far as it went.
In short, when people BELIEVE they are seeing a ‘UFO’, then it gets them mentally and emotionally (and spiritually) ‘excited’ and they enter an altered state of consciousness, where SOMETIMES INDEED they then encounter and even ‘materialize’ an ACTUAL (‘metaphysical’) ‘UFO’.
So the cover story, to hide the fact that the “Stay-puft” marshmallow effect, also known as the “Forbidden Planet Effect” is actually REAL, not always mind you, but sometimes (genetics and other things are a factor), then this is a four alarm fire that any governments that knows about this would be absolutely terrorized.
It’s really amusing to me. The two core stories have been ‘fighting each other’ for over seventy years now, but the two stories actually ENHANCE the actual effects, and still hardly anyone knows the ‘actual ‘terrible truth’.
That’s the ‘Phenomenon’ for you, at it’s very best. The same ‘Phenomenon’ that has kept me company since I was in the womb.
Am I saying that there are NO nuts-and-bolts craft? Not at all, but it’s nothing like the hype would have you believe it. Nothing that has ever crashed mind you, except in a few cases where small ‘saucers’ have ‘crashed’, and people enter them, and there are no engines or controls whatsoever. No, it’s not that there’s this hyper alien tech, it’s that the ‘Phenomenon’ has outdone itself by ‘pranking’. The ‘Phenomenon’ has loved to prank since primates dropped from the trees and lived in caves.
There’s also evidence of something else, ‘nuts and bolts’ but that’s a story for another day, another page.
‘Absolute Disclosure’, ‘Real Disclosure’ has little to do with any of the Kabuki Theater you see in the media, whether it’s created by governments, the military industrialists, or even crypto and tech ‘robber barons.
You see, the USEFULNESS of a ‘Disclosure Story’ can be used for vast societal manipulation, and dozens of warring factions want to become rich, by having their story be the one who wins the fake-off food fight.
Since these factions keep each other in rough ‘checkmate’, that’s why nobody gets to win the ‘Disclosure war’.
You can easily see this in action without a security clearance… traces exist in wikileaks… traces are quite obvious when any ‘whistleblower’ shows up who has a vested self-interest in the story unfolding ‘their way’. Warhawks push the ‘threat narrative’. Tech people the ‘reverse engineering angle’, the crypto guys are the icing on the cake, the only reason they would push this is if they can make a crypto buck with it, and the extreme oddity of their ‘whistleblowing’ shows that they are leading with their weakness and illuminates the principle for all the other ‘whistleblowers’.
The best way to tell is to watch people. Dishonest people ‘Lead with their weakness’. The more they clamor for something, that’s the proof of their bullshit.
The more honest people say ‘maybe’ a lot.
So… ‘maybe’. But I’ve been around the block with this for a long time, it wouldn’t hurt to listen. I don’t make any money on this, or any fame.
In closing, I know some of the folks ‘in the second row’ or know some of their friends anyway, there ARE ‘real disclosure researchers’ involved as well, but they tend to get stepped on by the more vicious actors in this vast, multi-party ‘standoff’.
Kevin Cann
10/30/2024