Does Space Emerge from A Holographic Boundary?
Modern science gets closer to the truth of things all the time.
In Platonic Surrealism, there are no ‘real’ dimensions at all, simply pre-observed causal chains.
Some of the information in those causal chains is encoded to give the appearance of ‘dimensions’.
It isn’t that we are in a black hole, whose surface encodes another dimension, though <clap, clap> that is not BAD AT ALL. In-dream science gets pretty impressive, no?
Now, I’m not claiming that there is no internal consistency at all, that it’s just a completely fake ‘matrix’. Not at all. It’s just that the actual rules aren’t what we think they are.
In a sense, our entire ‘pothole universe is ‘falling’ (that gives the impression of ‘the expanding universe) towards its false vacuum bottom state.
However, what’s interesting to observe, is that this falling towards the ‘absolute bottom state’ only asymptotically approaches the false vacuum state and is ALMOST frozen in time. That’s why we don’t go ‘boom!’, for a very long time.
Now the ‘anti-matter universe’ that holds 95% of the mass is also asymptotically falling towards us as well, and in fact it’s this interaction, of matter vs anti-matter universes falling towards each other in the ‘pothole’ of the ‘bulk’ that produces the false vacuum floor for BOTH universes.
One could also borrow the concept of mirror symmetry, that ‘matter’ and ‘antimatter’ could under some circumstances repel each other and thus not go ‘boom’. That’s not quite it, but it’s close. It’s really that dual-mutual non-charged, massless particle false vacuum barrier as the major reason that we haven’t gone boom (yet).
Isn’t it wonderful? It’s the very presence of the DUAL false vacuums that keeps us from falling to the base state floor!
This also sets us up for a cyclic universe, which a lot of folks really like the idea of (and it’s true).
Nifty, keen, eh?
Now, admittedly this ‘new facility’ to turn the ‘seer’s eye’ away from just ‘religion and spirituality’ towards something possibly falsifiable is hardly reliable at this juncture. But someday it will be. If as Penrose says, we use ‘quantum processing’ in our nanotubules (just to use an in-dream physics reference), even with in-dream ‘logic’, there’s no reason in the world that we couldn’t tap into a perception of quantum-level events.
None at all.
‘REALITY’ is far more wonderous than scientific metaphors, but I do love the scientific metaphors.
Kevin Cann
10/5/2024